Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:22 pm Posts: 1363 Location: Fleetwood
Phil,
That entirely depends on the person wielding them. If used in a responsible manner, in conjunction with proper archaeological investigation, then 'metal detectors' are definitely valuable. If used solely for the purpose of treasure hunting with no stratigraphic records, G.P.S-ing etc being taken, then they're just being wielded by a dirty tool.
As a "responsible" metal detectorist for some years now, I concur totally with Brian's comments. Sadly, there are people out there who view the hobby solely as a means to make money, by "night hawking" on archaeological sites. In my experiece responsible detectorists, who compose the bulk of those engaged in the hobby will tell you that the monetary value of an old coin or artifact they may unearth, is of far less importance to them than the historical context. And in any event it is only very rarely that such a find has serious financial value - a denarius of Hadrian I uncovered locally a few months ago is only valued at some £25. By contrast, I view the context is which it was found as far more important.
It is worth noting that well over 90% of the significant finds made in this country over the last thirty years, have been found by random searches conducted by metal detectorists - witness the recent Saxon hoard uncovered a few weeks ago. Quite often such a find can also lead to important archaeological work on a previously unknown site.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum